Monday, March 3, 2008

Teacher Is Probably Toast After Showing Pro-life Movie

Life News.com reports that "A California science teacher has been placed on administrative leave after coming under fire following the showing of a pro-life film, The Silent Scream, that details an abortion procedure. First-year teacher Randy Yang showed the movie to five eighth-grade classes at Russell Middle School."



I suspect Yang is going to get in trouble since he doesn't have tenure in the school.   The teacher's union is in bed with the abortion lobby.  So Yang won't get much help.  When you think of the stuff kids are exposed to in school, abortion's probably no big deal.  They'll teach our kids everything they don't need to know about sex, but they don't want anyone knowing the truth about abortion and how it kills a baby. 



British Artist Commits Suicide After Aborting Twins

British Artist Emma Beck committed suicide after aborting her two twins.  Beck did not want the abortion, but her boyfriend pushed her into it.  Not much media sympathy here.  That's because abortion is a Golden Calf and it's worshipers cannot speak anything evil of this idol. 



I remember our second or third show on the old Voice for Life radio show with my co-host Toni Berry.  We had a post abortive woman on who had been suicidal and very depressed.  She told the psychiatrist that her problems were abortion related.  It didn't fit the psychiatrist's schema and she went unhelped.



Abortion advocates will pretty much say if there's a problem like this after abortion, there was something wrong with the woman ahead of time.  Talk about blaming the victim. 



Abortion kills a baby.  It also kills a part of the woman.  In one survey, 60 percent said "part of me died" after the abortion.   



Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Credit Bush For Stem Cell Discovery.

Here is an opinion I wrote for Nevada LIFE that was published in the Reno Gazette Journal earlier this month regarding the new stem cell technique that turns normal cells back to an embryonic-like pluripotent state wihtout killing embryos!  Researchers have done this in humans and grown them into the three cell layers of the body.  This is unbelievable news.  It undermines the need for embryonic stem cell research, kills the rationale for cloning, and President Bush deserves credit for sticking to his principles in the face of belittling comments from Harry Reid and others.  Here's the opinion.



Credit Bush for Stem Cell Discovery.



"The news that scientists were able to reprogram skin cells back into embryonic like-(pluripotent) cells and then turn them into each of the body's three cell layers without killing human embryos diminishes, if not ends, the argument for embryonic stem cell research that destroys embryos and the rationale for human cloning.



"One secret of embryonic stem cell research is that even if scientists used the embryos available in fertility labs, they would not create the genetic diversity necessary for mass cures. Human cloning (somatic cell nuclear transfer) to create embryos for stem cells was thought to be necessary to overcome the problems of rejection and produce patient specific stem cell matches.



"This new discovery can achieve matches without cloning and without destroying human life because it reprograms a person's own cells and bypasses the complicated, expensive and immoral process of cloning.



"Now scientists should have stem cells with the properties they said for years that they needed for regenerative medicine. But after years of saying that embryonic stem cell research that destroys human embryos was the only or best option, who would have believed this discovery? President Bush.



"When President Bush vetoed an embryonic stem cell bill that would have led to more killing of human embryos, Sen. Harry Reid accused the president of "putting politics ahead of safe, responsible science." He said the veto was a "most un-American thing by turning his back on science." Bush was "putting the politics of his narrow ideology ahead of saving lives," had decided that curing diseases "was not as important as catering to his right-wing base," vetoed the bill "with the health and hope of millions of Americans hanging in the balance," and said "our best scientists continue to work with one hand tied behind their back."



"Congressman Edward Markey said the veto would "be remembered as a Luddite moment in American history." Local activists said Bush vetoed hope for sufferers.



"But while Reid was trashing the president, the "Luddite-narrow ideology" president was talking about the possibility of this new technology and funding efforts like this by presidential directive when Congress would not.



"The president was a visionary leader and believed in the resourcefulness of scientists. He deserves credit for insisting on ethical research. Had he not, more time and resources would have been spent on research that destroys human life, has not worked as scientists had hoped and appears to be ending.



"With this discovery, it's time to pass the Brownback-Landrieu cloning ban and ban all human cloning.



"This discovery, along with the incredible breakthroughs with non-embryonic stem cell research, is something we can all celebrate. Ethical science is good science."



Muscle cell therapy repairs damaged heart

The AP in Japan reports that a man who was waiting for a heart transplant was treated with his own stem cells and has now returned to a normal life.  One case doesn't make a therapy, but it is good news. 



If this was an embryonic stem cell success, it would be on the front page of every paper in the world.  Bioethicist Wesley Smith believes that the new stem cell technique, which regresses/reverts ordinary skin cells back to a pluripotent state (embryonic stem cells are believed to be pluripotent and can become any kind of cell) has popped the balloon on embryonic stem cell research.  He believes there's been an embargo on stories like this to promote the need for embryonic stem cell research.  Now that scientists have the same kinds of cells, he thinks we'll see more of this.  I don't know.  But, if he's right this is good news because there is more going on than the public could ever know. 



Do No Harm notes that there are over 70 applications using non-embryonic stem cell research and there are over 1000 trials.  Anyway, this story out of Japan is good news and hopefully we'll see more. 



Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Who Is Anti-Science Now?

As you know by now, there was a huge embryonic stem cell find today. Scientists announced today that they have successfully reprogrammed adult stem cells back to an embryonic-like state. The Journal Nature says today that "Shinya Yamanaka of the University of Kyoto in Japan reported that his team had created pluripotent cells from human skin cells and, on the same day, a team of researchers led by James Thomson at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, reported the same." Pluripotent cells are stem cells like embryonic stem cells which are believed to be able to become any kind of cell.



Bioethicist Wesley Smith says that " researchers reverted human connective tissue cells back to an embryonic- stem-cell-like state - and then differentiated them into all three of the body's major tissue types. If this work pans out, there will be no need to create human cloned embryos for use in embryonic-stem-cell therapies."



This means that embryonic stem cell researchers and supporters may have a supply of embryonic stem cells to work with and according to Yamanaka, "Any scientist with basic technology in molecular and cell biology can do reprogramming." 



Embryonic stem cell supporters and researchers said we were anti-science, anti-patient, anti-intellectual boobs who let our beliefs get in the way of science.  But, Yamanaka and Thompson's work was unbelievable and wasn't where scientists were looking and saying the best hope was!  Now that they have their supply of embryonic stem cells, and ones that are easier to procure than by cloning (nuclear transfer) and probably have more genetic compatibility with the donor, we'll see if there is something more driving cloning for embryonic stem cells or if there's something ideological going on like undermining Christianity or protecting abortion.  If we can cannibalize embryos for research, how can we oppose abortion? 



We'll see how the other side responds to success.  Now they have a couple sources.  They have this regression for embryonic stem cells, amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood.  Their reactions will tell us a lot about them and what they have been saying the last several years.



Saturday, November 17, 2007

How Can They Do That? Why Pro-Lifers Keep At It.

I look at pictures of aborted babies and I watch steaming video.  I do it to remind me what abortion is all about.  I watched them again today at Priests For Life's site. 



I've been in pro-life, anti-abortion work for a long time.  The rejection, your disbelief that others don't want to join you... all of that hardens you.  But no matter how long a pro-life worker has been working, or how many times he or she has seen pictures and video of the unborn child, seeing these images still breaks us up.  When we think we can't go on any longer, these pictures call us forward. 



And their broken bodies should.  What kind of humanity does a person have if he or she is not moved by inhumanity to other humans?  Their helplessness, weakness and dependency don't make them disposable.  They demand that we give them more protection and care!



Yesterday I was speaking at a local Christian school.  In the section where I was showing partial birth abortion diagrams.  Out of the corner of my eye, I noticed a teen age girl wiping away a tear.  I showed other pictures found at the links below and two young ladies asked me afterwards, "how can they do that?"  How can they do that?



Images at Priests for Life.



Here are some links to streaming video I watched today at Priests For Life's Website. 



The abortion procedure is described here, with former abortionist Dr. Tony Levatino (22:00)
www.pfltv.com/sfydr

Body parts of aborted babies (5:00)
www.pfltv.com/imag

Dr. Byron Calhoun examines aborted babies and describes their cause of death (14:00)

www.pfltv.com/babies 



Another Reason Pro-lifers Should Be Careful About Recommending The Pill

Most pro-life groups stay away from the contraception issue.  Our interest begins at conception and continues until natural death.  Abortion advocates want to force us into contraceptive distribution and education.  Though many pro-lifers probably support contraception, most organizations have stayed out of it. 



There are other reasons to stay away too.  More and more research is showing bad effects on women from the pill.  Not only does it cause women to gain weight, become agitated/depressed and kill the sex drive, a new study suggests it can cause 20-30 percent more clogging of the arteries for every 10 years of use.  This came up in a USA Today Article "Study Links Birth Control Pill To Artery Causing Plague." 



Jim Sedlak at American Life League notes some other problems with the pill in his November 14, 2007 STOPP (Stop Planned Parenthood) update. "It has already been proven that the birth control pill can cause health risks. The pill can cause weight gain, acne, breast and cervical cancer and infertility. It lowers immunity to STDs and can also kill the baby that is inside the mother. Not only can the birth control pill cause abortions and increase chances of breast and cervical cancer, but now it has been proven that the birth control pill can endanger a woman’s heart".



Jim also says, "of course you wouldn’t find any of these scientific facts in Planned Parenthood’s “medically accurate” sex education programs. Planned Parenthood received an estimated $180 million of its $345.1 million clinic income during the 2005-2006 fiscal year from the sales of birth control products, including the pill."